Sunday, May 31, 2009
Saturday, May 30, 2009
It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people. True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists. Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters. First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their "right" to choke down a McDonalds burger or a BurgerKing burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our "democracy". Pride blind the foolish. Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different "branches and denominations" were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the "winning" side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the "winning" side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America.
The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.
These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them? These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties and powers of the American congress (parliament). Again, congress has put up little more then a whimper to their masters. Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motor) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of "pure" free markets, the American president now has the power, the self given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will. Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions. So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a "bold" move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too.
Prime Minister Putin, less then two months ago, warned Obama and UK's Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our "wise" Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride.
Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper...but a "freeman" whimper. So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set "fair" maximum salaries, evaluate performance and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses? Senator Barney Franks, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort. He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive. The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left.
The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker.
Will you people WAKE UP!!!!!
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
During his nauseating campaign, Barrack Obama proclaimed "When there's a bill that ends up on my desk as president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out what's in it before I sign it, so that you know what your government's doing". But that was not the case for last week's bills, at least some of which weren't in their final form until a day or two before being sent to Mr. Obama, and that doesn't match the president's pledge to give Americans time to comment on the final version he is about to sign.
President Obama had threatened to nominate liberal judicial activist who would indulge their left-wing policy preferences instead of neutrally applying the law.We all knew a minority female would be particular attractive to our politically correct president (even if this particular female minority was not the brightest bulb on the billboard) .In selecting Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his Supreme Court nominee, President Obama has carried out his threat.
Sotomayor readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases.
Watch this clip in which this crazy bitch states "The Court of Appeals is where policy is made" (She goes on to note that she shouldn’t say that publicly).
Just what we need, a left wing activist legislating from the bench.
Sotomayor is a committed believer in the identity politics school of left-wing thought.
She believes that it is legitimate for judges to base decisions on their ethnic or racial origins.
Do you really want a justice who comes close to stereotyping white males as inferior beings?
Monday, May 25, 2009
Why does Powell now seem to think he has the right (or credibility) to tell Republicans on how their party should be run?
Republicans are being told what they must do by a man who will almost certainly vote for Obama in 2012? That ain't right!
What is this horse shit about being more "moderate", being more like the Democraps?
C'mon, we all remember New Coke, Coca Cola's new recipe that tasted more like a Pepsi.That shit failed miserably.What an embarrassment - Coke was forced to revert to its traditional taste, and save face by releasing Coca Cola Classic.
It's time for the Republican party to respond in kind.
It's time for some CONSERVATISM CLASSIC!!!!
Friday, May 22, 2009
Thursday, May 21, 2009
The Obama administration, through a string of delicate shifts in terminology, has softened the essence of the war against Islamic extremism.
Some key policy terms for the Obama administration:
Detainees: Custodial informants
Terrorists: Improvised ideologues
Deficit: Long shortfall (or inverted surplus)
One trillion dollars: Nth power financing
Abortion: Reproductive choice
Border violence: Territorial imperative
Torture: Non-verbal questioning
Taxes: Income tweaks
And I suppose those hijackers that flew into the towers, causing that "man-caused disaster" are now "disgruntled airline passengers".
**= the statists would probably rebrand my post title as "A Rose By Any Other Name..."
This Rebranding certainly won't make these problems disappear or make us any safer. Its just a way of trying to ram their liberal philosophy down everyone's throat.
It reminds me of Orwell's Newspeak.
"The Principles of Newspeak"
An appendix to 1984
Written by : George Orwell in 1948
The government's plans include giving stakes in the new company to GM's union and bondholders, although the ownership structure of the company is still being negotiated, said the source who is familiar with the company's plans.
They shoulda just let them go belly-up in the first place.It would have been a lot cheaper!
Oh but we were told, "they're too big to fail".I wonder if our once great nation is "too big to fail".
I've been to the DMV, and we all know how efficient the post office is.The gov't, especially this administration, has no business running a business!
BTW, does anyone know how to say 'Yugo' in Newspeak?
Thursday, May 14, 2009
These Statists may just bring themselves down, given enuff time.
Pelosi, blinded by blood lust, seems poised to be entrapped in the very snare in which she had hoped to catch her rivals.For once her over-zealousness may work for the good of our nation.And the Bamster, being the narcissistic megalomaniac that he is, will be more than willing to sacrifice that shrew for his own self preservation.
The term schadenfreude leaps to mind, as I gleam with pleasure at the thought of her helplessly struggling in her web of deceit.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
James Oberstar (D-MN), will roll back earmark transparency protocols adopted by the House and Senate Appropriations committees in January this year.
The Boston-area trolley driver, who slammed into another train while text-messaging his girlfriend, was hired as a minority because of his transgendered "female-to-male" status.
I guess qualified heterosexual white males need not apply.
A LOT of things....hehehe."~Homer Simpson
Layers of sophisticated fact-checking are foiled again, as Irish student hoaxes the media with fake quote.
Shane Fitzgerald said he was testing how our globalized, increasingly Internet-dependent media was upholding accuracy and accountability in an age of instant news.
MC recently posted of Mr. Sowell, as well.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
U.S. Will Pay $2.6 Million to Train Chinese Prostitutes to Drink Responsibly on the Job
As Hilary and Obama prostitute themselves before the Chinese so they will continue to buy our debt, we're now paying to start what amounts to "A.A." programs for Chinese hookers????
It gets even worse,
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
This is truly disturbing.
The court ruled unanimously Monday in favor of (Wetback) Ignacio Carlos Flores-Figueroa, an undocumented worker from Mexico, who was given an additional two years in prison for aggravated identity theft. He presented his employer with Social Security and alien registration numbers that belonged to other people.
It adds insult to injury when they refer to that beaner as "an undocumented worker".Call a spade a spade, damn it! He's a freaking ILLEGAL ALIEN! They need to deport that bastard (and his kind) post haste (and maybe rough him up a bit on the way).
Political correctness is just Leftist bigotry and should never trump the truth.
Political Correctness is 'The Scourge of Our Times'.It is none but, a dangerous form of censorship and oppression, imposed upon the citizenry with the ultimate goal of manipulating, brainwashing and destroying our society.
Quoth Andrew Breitbart, "Political Correctness is Torture".
Monday, May 4, 2009
Or should I say how many times?
New DHS Counter-Terrorism Initiatives, Redefining “terrorist”Are real Americans really going to sit quietly by and let this corrupt Chicago Cabal define them as “domestic terrorists?”
The DHS analysis lists a number of political beliefs as being likely to contribute to an internal domestic threat. A person holding these views is deemed to be a right-wing extremist, or capable of being recruited into the right-wing extremist movement.
Domestic Extremism Lexicon (U.S. Department of Homeland Security Reference Aid)
BTW,The following demographics get mentioned, but not Muslims:
- White nationalists
- Black nationalists
- Mexican nationalists
- Puerto Rican nationalists
- Violent religious sects
- Jewish extremism
Their coming taxation is just a form of legalized theft, codified in law. Chairman (Ma-)Obama wants to turn this country into a socialist state and is creating a sense of dependency on government to solve all our problems. The average taxpayer will finance it all through redistribution of our wealth.
Saturday, May 2, 2009
This letter is respectfully submitted to inform you that I must decline the invitation to participate in the May 4 roundtable meeting the President’s Task Force on Detention Policy is convening with current and former prosecutors involved in international terrorism cases. An invitation was extended to me by trial lawyers from the Counterterrorism Section, who are members of the Task Force, which you are leading.
The invitation email (of April 14) indicates that the meeting is part of an ongoing effort to identify lawful policies on the detention and disposition of alien enemy combatants -- or what the Department now calls “individuals captured or apprehended in connection with armed conflicts and counterterrorism operations.” I admire the lawyers of the Counterterrorism Division, and I do not question their good faith. Nevertheless, it is quite clear -- most recently, from your provocative remarks on Wednesday in Germany -- that the Obama administration has already settled on a policy of releasing trained jihadists (including releasing some of them into the United States). Whatever the good intentions of the organizers, the meeting will obviously be used by the administration to claim that its policy was arrived at in consultation with current and former government officials experienced in terrorism cases and national security issues. I deeply disagree with this policy, which I believe is a violation of federal law and a betrayal of the president’s first obligation to protect the American people. Under the circumstances, I think the better course is to register my dissent, rather than be used as a prop.
Moreover, in light of public statements by both you and the President, it is dismayingly clear that, under your leadership, the Justice Department takes the position that a lawyer who in good faith offers legal advice to government policy makers—like the government lawyers who offered good faith advice on interrogation policy—may be subject to investigation and prosecution for the content of that advice, in addition to empty but professionally damaging accusations of ethical misconduct. Given that stance, any prudent lawyer would have to hesitate before offering advice to the government.
Beyond that, as elucidated in my writing (including my proposal for a new national security court, which I understand the Task Force has perused), I believe alien enemy combatants should be detained at Guantanamo Bay (or a facility like it) until the conclusion of hostilities. This national defense measure is deeply rooted in the venerable laws of war and was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in the 2004 Hamdi case. Yet, as recently as Wednesday, you asserted that, in your considered judgment, such notions violate America’s “commitment to the rule of law.” Indeed, you elaborated, “Nothing symbolizes our [administration’s] new course more than our decision to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay…. President Obama believes, and I strongly agree, that Guantanamo has come to represent a time and an approach that we want to put behind us: a disregard for our centuries-long respect for the rule of law[.]” (Emphasis added.)
Given your policy of conducting ruinous criminal and ethics investigations of lawyers over the advice they offer the government, and your specific position that the wartime detention I would endorse is tantamount to a violation of law, it makes little sense for me to attend the Task Force meeting. After all, my choice would be to remain silent or risk jeopardizing myself.
For what it may be worth, I will say this much. For eight years, we have had a robust debate in the United States about how to handle alien terrorists captured during a defensive war authorized by Congress after nearly 3000 of our fellow Americans were annihilated. Essentially, there have been two camps. One calls for prosecution in the civilian criminal justice system, the strategy used throughout the 1990s. The other calls for a military justice approach of combatant detention and war-crimes prosecutions by military commission. Because each theory has its downsides, many commentators, myself included, have proposed a third way: a hybrid system, designed for the realities of modern international terrorism—a new system that would address the needs to protect our classified defense secrets and to assure Americans, as well as our allies, that we are detaining the right people.
There are differences in these various proposals. But their proponents, and adherents to both the military and civilian justice approaches, have all agreed on at least one thing: Foreign terrorists trained to execute mass-murder attacks cannot simply be released while the war ensues and Americans are still being targeted. We have already released too many jihadists who, as night follows day, have resumed plotting to kill Americans. Indeed, according to recent reports, a released Guantanamo detainee is now leading Taliban combat operations in Afghanistan, where President Obama has just sent additional American forces.
The Obama campaign smeared Guantanamo Bay as a human rights blight. Consistent with that hyperbolic rhetoric, the President began his administration by promising to close the detention camp within a year. The President did this even though he and you (a) agree Gitmo is a top-flight prison facility, (b) acknowledge that our nation is still at war, and (c) concede that many Gitmo detainees are extremely dangerous terrorists who cannot be tried under civilian court rules. Patently, the commitment to close Guantanamo Bay within a year was made without a plan for what to do with these detainees who cannot be tried. Consequently, the Detention Policy Task Force is not an effort to arrive at the best policy. It is an effort to justify a bad policy that has already been adopted: to wit, the Obama administration policy to release trained terrorists outright if that’s what it takes to close Gitmo by January.
Obviously, I am powerless to stop the administration from releasing top al Qaeda operatives who planned mass-murder attacks against American cities—like Binyam Mohammed (the accomplice of “Dirty Bomber” Jose Padilla) whom the administration recently transferred to Britain, where he is now at liberty and living on public assistance. I am similarly powerless to stop the administration from admitting into the United States such alien jihadists as the 17 remaining Uighur detainees. According to National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair, the Uighurs will apparently live freely, on American taxpayer assistance, despite the facts that they are affiliated with a terrorist organization and have received terrorist paramilitary training. Under federal immigration law (the 2005 REAL ID Act), those facts render them excludable from theUnited States. The Uighurs’ impending release is thus a remarkable development given the Obama administration’s propensity to deride its predecessor’s purported insensitivity to the rule of law.
I am, in addition, powerless to stop the President, as he takes these reckless steps, from touting his Detention Policy Task Force as a demonstration of his national security seriousness. But I can decline to participate in the charade.
Finally, let me repeat that I respect and admire the dedication of Justice Department lawyers, whom I have tirelessly defended since I retired in 2003 as a chief assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York. It was a unique honor to serve for nearly twenty years as a federal prosecutor, under administrations of both parties. It was as proud a day as I have ever had when the trial team I led was awarded the Attorney General’s Exceptional Service Award in 1996, after we secured the convictions of Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman and his underlings for waging a terrorist war against the United States. I particularly appreciated receiving the award from Attorney General Reno—as I recounted in Willful Blindness, my book about the case, without her steadfastness against opposition from short-sighted government officials who wanted to release him, the “blind sheikh” would never have been indicted, much less convicted and so deservedly sentenced to life-imprisonment. In any event, I’ve always believed defending our nation is a duty of citizenship, not ideology. Thus, my conservative political views aside, I’ve made myself available to liberal and conservative groups, to Democrats and Republicans, who’ve thought tapping my experience would be beneficial. It pains me to decline your invitation, but the attendant circumstances leave no other option.
Very truly yours,
Andrew C. McCarthy
Friday, May 1, 2009
It seems the only difference is the ability to read a teleprompter, and shine-up real nice.
BANKRUPTCY LAWYER TOM LAURIA talks about the Chrysler deal.... And threats from the White House
... and speaking of thugs/community organizers, Jesse Jackass is back in the news.
But Wait! there's more.
Reverend Al, yet another black leader that exploits Black America, will need to cough up some $$ for the FEC.
HOPE AND CHANGE = DESPAIR AND MARXISM!
"... the circuit has exact representation in the race of their drivers to that of its crew chiefs Whereas the NFL has 70 percent black players and only a handful of black head coaches, NASCAR crew chiefs exactly represent the race of the drivers... 100 percent white to 100 percent white."(via SportsPickle.com)
David Letterman's** Top 10 reasons why there are no black
> NASCAR drivers:
> # 10 Have to sit upright while driving.
> # 9 Pistol won't stay under front seat.
> # 8 Engine noise drowns out the rap music.
> # 7 Pit crew can't work on car while holding up pants
> at the same time.
> # 6 They keep trying to carjack Dale Earnhardt Jr.
> # 5 Police cars on track interfere with race.
> # 4 No passenger seat for the Ho.
> # 3 No Cadillacs approved for competition..
> # 2 When they crash their cars, they bail out & run.
> AND THE NUMBER ONE REASON WHY BLACKS CAN'T BE IN
> # 1 They Can't wear their helmets sideways.
But wait! , How 'bout Wendell Scott? , the 'Jackie Robinson of auto racing', and subject of a Richard Pryor flick.
When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor. Long after the crowd and the queen had left, NASCAR grudgingly admitted that Scott had won.